How does game-based learning compare to traditional CEO programs in schools?

Q: How does game-based learning compare to traditional CEO programs in schools?

Game-based learning produces faster engagement and more reps per session. Traditional CEO programs produce deeper individual plans over a longer arc. The two solve different problems and work best in combination, not in opposition.

The story

A traditional high school CEO program runs for an academic year. Students meet daily, visit local businesses, host guest speakers, and develop their own ventures. By the end of the year, a strong student has launched something real. The depth is undeniable. The trade-off is reach. Most CEO programs serve 15 to 25 students per cohort because that's all the format can handle. Game-based learning takes the opposite trade. A 90-minute Lab session in a comedy game format gets every student in the room pitching, scoring, and rotating through 4 rounds. The depth per pitch is shallower. The reps per student are much higher. The energy in the room is different. A school that runs both gets the best of each: a deep CEO track for the committed few and a wide game-based touch for everyone else who needs exposure but isn't ready to commit a year.

What it means

Don't think of game-based learning as a replacement for CEO programs. Think of it as the on-ramp. Most students who eventually commit to a year-long entrepreneurship track first need a low-stakes way to discover that they enjoy the work. A game session is that on-ramp. It also gives the students who never sign up for the year-long program at least one real rep to remember.

Try it

• Play free at playsidehustle.com
• See us live: Sept 25 at Pershing Hall in Austin. luma.com/playsidehustle
• Email team@playsidehustle.com